04 385-7545
eco@eco.org.nz
  • Who We Are
    • What We Do
    • Our Team
  • Environmental action
    • Key Issues
      • Antarctic protection
      • Aquaculture
      • Biodiversity
      • Climate Energy
      • Catchment and Coastal
      • Forests
      • Lakes, Rivers and Wetlands
      • Mining
      • Oceans and Fisheries
      • Organics and GE
      • Waste
      • Energy
      • Resource Management
    • Current Petitions
    • Join a Working Group
      • Improved environmental management and laws
      • Conservation, biosecurity and biodiversity
      • Oceans, marine and fisheries
      • International, IUCN, Antarctica and the Southern Ocean
      • Climate Change and Energy
      • Open Democratic and Participative Society
      • Policy and promotion of our vision for the environment
  • Connect with ECO
    • Join ECO
    • Volunteering & Oppurtunities
  • Contact
Donate
Click Me
Some text

This content will appear inside a popup...

PMs Science Report on Fisheries is a missed opportunity

Posted on 29/03/2021
No Comments

The Report on commercial fishing by the PM’s Chief Science Advisor, Dame Juliet Gerrard, was made public in March.  The report came out of a process which was co-chaired by a representative of Seafood NZ, the commercial fishing organisation.

The recommendations are rather limited with the key element being a suggestion for an “Oceans Strategic Action Plan for 2040..”  But this isn’t the report that will result in precautionary fisheries management, protection of vulnerable marine ecosystems, or implementation of the Fisheries Act or observing our international obligations.

Dame Juliet’s personal foreward noted that as to “views of how environmentally sustainable commercial fisheries are in 2020, nearly every stakeholder we talked to agreed we could do better”.  She also noted “the poor relationship and lack of trust that characterise the sector”.  Its surprising she didn’t realise this when she started the process and established the limited cast of her advisory group. The membership of the advisory group can be found here.

There are some major omissions in the report which may in part be due to the limited terms of reference and the limited representation on the working group she established.  The Seafood Industry has welcomed the report.

The report does not address the lack of precautionary management in fisheries in New Zealand – in fact “precaution” is used only three times in the 300 plus page report. Precautionary management is set out in the UN Fish Stocks Agreement of which New Zealand is a party and affects orange roughy straddling stocks and highly migratory species (eg tuna and sharks).

Consideration of New Zealand’s international obligations relating to fishing, a requirement of section 5(a) of the Act is barely addressed.  Without the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) we wouldn’t have a 200 nautical mile Exclusive Economic Zone and its provisions which are different from those in our territorial sea.  Under UNCLOS states have an unqualified obligation to preserve and protect the marine environment (Article 192).

The report isn’t a prescription for effective fisheries management or for how to get more science on the large amount of unknowns in the managing fish stocks. The problems of the current fisheries costs recovery regime which has halved fisheries research in over 20 years gets little attention.

The report notes that setting aside 300 “nominal stocks”, “around a third of the commercial catch volume is made up of stocks that have never been assessed” (see figure).  This “leaves a high uncertainty around the size of the stock and the level of impact commercial fishing may or may not be having”.  In addition, many of the stocks that have been assessed, involve assessments which are five or more years old.

The report notes that key sections of the 1996 Fisheries Act have never been applied: “There have been no habitats of particular significance for fisheries management defined or applied in the approximately 25 years the Fisheries Act 1996 has been in place.”

In her foreword, Professor Gerrard, has “challenge[d] the Minister and the regulator to strengthen their arm and use these provisions to catalyse change”.

Her foreward to the report has cryptic commentary on “alternate facts”.  There is little recognition that fisheries or resource management is always open to some degree of interpretation of the information – there is a lot of “grey” information.  Given the level of uncertainty there is a clear need for precaution in resource management decision making.

A principal failing of the report is that it looks only at commercial fishing and for that reason has a strong bias in favour of commercial fishing. Commercial fishing needs to be looked at in the context of all fisheries (customary, non-commercial and commercial) and in the context of the marine environment.

Internationally New Zealand has agreed under the Convention on Biodiversity Aichi biodiversity targets and in Sustainable Development goals to “By 2020 sustainably manage and protect marine and coastal ecosystems to avoid significant adverse impacts…” (Target 14.2).

Change is definitely needed in fisheries management if Aotearoa-New Zealand is to protect vulnerable marine ecosystems, at risk biodiversity, and consider the oceans as a whole rather than just an unlinked bunch of fish stocks.

For further information see: PM Science: The future of commercial fishing in Aotearoa New Zealand – there are three documents the full report is 30 megs and the Key messages report (5 megs)
MSN-Newshub – Commercial fisheries report reveals how ‘frighteningly little’ we know about ocean

  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on Twitter
  • Share on Linkedin

 

Previous Post
Official Information Act review delayed again
Next Post
New Rules for Incorporated Societies: Bill Introduced

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Fill out this field
Fill out this field
Please enter a valid email address.
You need to agree with the terms to proceed

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Recent Posts

  • Emerging from the Shadows: Resource Management System Reform 08/03/2022
  • ECO calls for more funding on climate action and biodiversity protection 08/03/2022
  • Importance of protecting Significant Natural Areas 05/08/2021
  • ECO calls for an end to bottom trawling on seamounts and other underwater ecosystems. 08/06/2021
  • Consultation on phasing out fossil fuels in process heat 21/04/2021

Categories

  • Agriculture and farming (2)
  • Antarctica (2)
  • Biodiversity (14)
  • Building (1)
  • Climate Change (19)
  • Conservation (14)
  • COVID (1)
  • ECO (7)
  • Fisheries (10)
  • Forestry (1)
  • Freshwater (7)
  • Genetic Engineering (2)
  • Health (3)
  • Marine (10)
  • Oceania (8)
  • Organics (1)
  • Pollution (7)
  • Resource Management Act (1)
  • Science (11)
  • Uncategorized (10)

ECO is a registered charitable entity under the Charities Act 2005. ECO was founded in 1971 as CoEnCo to meet the needs of the conservation community. We became ECO in 1976. We are a non-profit network of 50+ organizations with a concern for conservation and the environment.

Important Links

  • What We Do
  • Our Team
  • Join A Working Group
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy
Donate Now

Contacts

eco@eco.org.nz
04 385-7545
Level 2, 126 Vivian St, Wellington 6011, PO Box 11-057 Wellington New Zealand 6142
Facebook
Twitter

Recent Posts

  • Emerging from the Shadows: Resource Management System Reform 08/03/2022
  • ECO calls for more funding on climate action and biodiversity protection 08/03/2022
  • Importance of protecting Significant Natural Areas 05/08/2021
  • ECO calls for an end to bottom trawling on seamounts and other underwater ecosystems. 08/06/2021
  • Consultation on phasing out fossil fuels in process heat 21/04/2021

© Copyright 2008-2021 – Environment and Conservation Organisations of New Zealand (ECO) Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Site designed & hosted by Alpharditech

Sitemap | Disclaimer