04 385-7545
eco@eco.org.nz
  • Who We Are
    • What We Do
    • Our Team
  • Environmental action
    • Key Issues
      • Antarctic protection
      • Aquaculture
      • Biodiversity
      • Climate Energy
      • Catchment and Coastal
      • Forests
      • Lakes, Rivers and Wetlands
      • Mining
      • Oceans and Fisheries
      • Organics and GE
      • Waste
      • Energy
      • Resource Management
    • Current Petitions
    • Join a Working Group
      • Improved environmental management and laws
      • Conservation, biosecurity and biodiversity
      • Oceans, marine and fisheries
      • International, IUCN, Antarctica and the Southern Ocean
      • Climate Change and Energy
      • Open Democratic and Participative Society
      • Policy and promotion of our vision for the environment
  • Connect with ECO
    • Join ECO
    • Volunteering & Oppurtunities
  • Contact
Donate
Click Me
Some text

This content will appear inside a popup...

Sarah Thomson legal case on climate change action: can you help?

Posted on 20/11/2017
No Comments

Climate change activist Jeanette Fitzsimons summarises the findings of the legal case brought in May this year to the High Court at Wellington.  Sarah challenged the then National government’s weak climate change targets.

 

Many readers will be aware of Sarah Thomson’s legal challenge to the National Government’s pathetic climate change target.  Although  the judge ultimately didn’t order a review of our 2050 and 2030 targets, there are still lots of wins to celebrate. Justice Mallon’s decision says:

–  the Minister had an obligation to review the 2050 target in light of recent science—in particular, the AR5 report—and failed to do so. She confirmed that ministers, whether for climate change or otherwise, have a duty to review important, long-term decisions when the science and facts underpinning those decisions change.

– contrary to the claim by the Crown’s lawyers that the 2030 target was in the realm of policy and ‘politics’, and beyond the court’s expertise, in law the 2030 target could be reviewed by the Court.  Even though setting an emissions target requires the weighing up of complicated economic, social, political and policy factors, the courts can still scrutinise such decisions.

In the judge’s own words:

“The Courts have recognised the significance of the issue for the planet and its inhabitants and that those in the Court’s jurisdiction are necessarily among all who are affected by inadequate efforts to respond to climate change

…This approach is consistent with the view that justiciability concerns depend on the ground for review rather that its subject matter. The subject matter may make a review ground more difficult to establish, but it should not rule out any review by the Court.

The importance of the matter for all and each of us warrants some scrutiny of the public power, in addition to accountability through Parliament and Elections.”

In the end, Justice Mallon declined to order a review. In part, this was because our new Government has announced it will pursue a 2050 carbon neutral New Zealand.

This decision sets legal precedents for challenging governments on many other environmental issues. Many people recognised the importance of this and contributed to the Givealittle page for Sarah’s costs. However, although the lawyers generously donated their time, there is still a shortfall of $2,355 for court costs, travel, paperwork and other out of pocket expenses.

If you can help us clear this debt and take the burden off Sarah’s shoulders, please contribute on the Givealittle site

Previous Post
Preparing our houses for the summer break
Next Post
Ross Sea: Antarctic Marine Protection Comes into force on 1 December 2017

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Fill out this field
Fill out this field
Please enter a valid email address.
You need to agree with the terms to proceed

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Recent Posts

  • Emerging from the Shadows: Resource Management System Reform 08/03/2022
  • ECO calls for more funding on climate action and biodiversity protection 08/03/2022
  • Importance of protecting Significant Natural Areas 05/08/2021
  • ECO calls for an end to bottom trawling on seamounts and other underwater ecosystems. 08/06/2021
  • Consultation on phasing out fossil fuels in process heat 21/04/2021

Categories

  • Agriculture and farming (2)
  • Antarctica (2)
  • Biodiversity (14)
  • Building (1)
  • Climate Change (19)
  • Conservation (14)
  • COVID (1)
  • ECO (7)
  • Fisheries (10)
  • Forestry (1)
  • Freshwater (7)
  • Genetic Engineering (2)
  • Health (3)
  • Marine (10)
  • Oceania (8)
  • Organics (1)
  • Pollution (7)
  • Resource Management Act (1)
  • Science (11)
  • Uncategorized (10)

ECO is a registered charitable entity under the Charities Act 2005. ECO was founded in 1971 as CoEnCo to meet the needs of the conservation community. We became ECO in 1976. We are a non-profit network of 50+ organizations with a concern for conservation and the environment.

Important Links

  • What We Do
  • Our Team
  • Join A Working Group
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy
Donate Now

Contacts

eco@eco.org.nz
04 385-7545
Level 2, 126 Vivian St, Wellington 6011, PO Box 11-057 Wellington New Zealand 6142
Facebook
Twitter

Recent Posts

  • Emerging from the Shadows: Resource Management System Reform 08/03/2022
  • ECO calls for more funding on climate action and biodiversity protection 08/03/2022
  • Importance of protecting Significant Natural Areas 05/08/2021
  • ECO calls for an end to bottom trawling on seamounts and other underwater ecosystems. 08/06/2021
  • Consultation on phasing out fossil fuels in process heat 21/04/2021

© Copyright 2008-2021 – Environment and Conservation Organisations of New Zealand (ECO) Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Site designed & hosted by Alpharditech

Sitemap | Disclaimer