04 385-7545
eco@eco.org.nz
  • Who We Are
    • What We Do
    • Our Team
  • Environmental action
    • Key Issues
      • Antarctic protection
      • Aquaculture
      • Biodiversity
      • Climate Energy
      • Catchment and Coastal
      • Forests
      • Lakes, Rivers and Wetlands
      • Mining
      • Oceans and Fisheries
      • Organics and GE
      • Waste
      • Energy
      • Resource Management
    • Current Petitions
    • Join a Working Group
      • Improved environmental management and laws
      • Conservation, biosecurity and biodiversity
      • Oceans, marine and fisheries
      • International, IUCN, Antarctica and the Southern Ocean
      • Climate Change and Energy
      • Open Democratic and Participative Society
      • Policy and promotion of our vision for the environment
  • Connect with ECO
    • Join ECO
    • Volunteering & Oppurtunities
  • Contact
Donate
Click Me
Some text

This content will appear inside a popup...

Mining Still threatens the Coromandel: How did this happen?

Posted on 08/07/2019
No Comments

 

The mining industry, and their political stooges, are always shouting about ‘checks and balances’ to shut down our arguments. They claim that we are scaremongerers, making mischief, stirring – a range of derogatory, dismissive things. They are quick to point out that there are a number of ‘tests’ in the Resource Management Act (RMA) that will ensure that the environment is protected and that impacts are minimised, and that many of these will give our communities an opportunity to have a say.

There are a range of issues with this argument – the RMA has been changed beyond all recognition since its inception in 1991; public participation elements were gutted back in 2013, there is severely limited knowledge of the RMA and how it works amongst the general public, the provisions that would enable participation, more publicly available information etc varies from Council to Council – as does that Councils ability and resourcing to evaluate highly technical information… the list goes on.

All of these things add up to a huge warning – we can NOT rely on the RMA to protect the environment from mining.

Lets think now about the timeline of the exploration and now mining permit application at Wharekirauponga; lets see how many opportunities for broad (or even any, other than limited with tangata whenua) public participation and consultation there has been in this process, this process that has seen Oceana Gold invest such a significant amount of money in ‘just looking’ at Wharekirauponga – public Conservation land that’s home to several threatened species, including the worlds most threatened frog, the Archey’s frog.

To clarify, this Mining Permit Application is actually over part of two Exploration Permit areas. So where so far has the public, the potentially affected communities, the people who work in, do conservation in, tramp in, camp in, hunt in etc, had an opportunity to have any say at all? Lets take a look back…

The permit was initially granted on 22 May 2003 over 3650ha to HPD New Zealand Limited. Three years later an extension of land, followed by ‘permit dealings’ (where shares in the permit were traded amongst a couple of different companies) were all granted. Next an extension of duration, another permit for more land, another share change, two more extensions of land, another change to the shares all granted. Then finally, 2016 Oceana took over, appraisal extension of duration and change of conditions all granted and now Mining Permit application – under evaluation.

Couldn’t see any mentions of public consultation in there? That’s because, in the 16 years that this area has been being ‘explored’ for gold, there has been none (zero, nada, zip, zilch). Does that mean that there has not been any resource consents required under the RMA for this ‘little look’? No – in this case it has involved clearing multiple plots of bush in a Significant Natural Area – that is a place that is special within the district – which must require consents, it has involved proposals to relocate significant threatened species populations (which has failed in the past), it has involved requiring access to freshwater, which also must be consented.

But, we got NO say at any stage. And now, one of the big arguments that Oceana uses to pile on the pressure to let them continue, to build yet more toxic tailings, to mine and undermine public Conservation land, to question the integrity of Aotearoa New Zealand’s Government Ministers (El Salvador, anyone?!), is that they have already invested so much ‘exploring’ and that the RMA will protect the environment.

Along with the Industry at large, this company must not be allowed to get away with ‘speaking out both corners of their mouth’. Time to call them on it – they are not sustainable, they do not care for our country. They have shareholders, they want profit. Simple.

Gold mining is not our future.

Please do contact us if you would like a copy of the timeline of this permit – 16 years of the industry doing what they want without any community consultation.

Coromandel Watchdog Co-Ordinator

Originally from:  https://watchdog.org.nz/how-did-this-happen/?
Tags: #savethecoromandel, #tooprecious, Resource Management Act,
Previous Post
Design Tips for an Eco-Friendly and Low – Carbon Home
Next Post
Court of Appeal judgement on seabed mining celebrated

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Fill out this field
Fill out this field
Please enter a valid email address.
You need to agree with the terms to proceed

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Recent Posts

  • Emerging from the Shadows: Resource Management System Reform 08/03/2022
  • ECO calls for more funding on climate action and biodiversity protection 08/03/2022
  • Importance of protecting Significant Natural Areas 05/08/2021
  • ECO calls for an end to bottom trawling on seamounts and other underwater ecosystems. 08/06/2021
  • Consultation on phasing out fossil fuels in process heat 21/04/2021

Categories

  • Agriculture and farming (2)
  • Antarctica (2)
  • Biodiversity (14)
  • Building (1)
  • Climate Change (19)
  • Conservation (14)
  • COVID (1)
  • ECO (7)
  • Fisheries (10)
  • Forestry (1)
  • Freshwater (7)
  • Genetic Engineering (2)
  • Health (3)
  • Marine (10)
  • Oceania (8)
  • Organics (1)
  • Pollution (7)
  • Resource Management Act (1)
  • Science (11)
  • Uncategorized (10)

ECO is a registered charitable entity under the Charities Act 2005. ECO was founded in 1971 as CoEnCo to meet the needs of the conservation community. We became ECO in 1976. We are a non-profit network of 50+ organizations with a concern for conservation and the environment.

Important Links

  • What We Do
  • Our Team
  • Join A Working Group
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy
Donate Now

Contacts

eco@eco.org.nz
04 385-7545
Level 2, 126 Vivian St, Wellington 6011, PO Box 11-057 Wellington New Zealand 6142
Facebook
Twitter

Recent Posts

  • Emerging from the Shadows: Resource Management System Reform 08/03/2022
  • ECO calls for more funding on climate action and biodiversity protection 08/03/2022
  • Importance of protecting Significant Natural Areas 05/08/2021
  • ECO calls for an end to bottom trawling on seamounts and other underwater ecosystems. 08/06/2021
  • Consultation on phasing out fossil fuels in process heat 21/04/2021

© Copyright 2008-2021 – Environment and Conservation Organisations of New Zealand (ECO) Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Site designed & hosted by Alpharditech

Sitemap | Disclaimer