04 385-7545
eco@eco.org.nz
  • Who We Are
    • What We Do
    • Our Team
  • Environmental action
    • Key Issues
      • Antarctic protection
      • Aquaculture
      • Biodiversity
      • Climate Energy
      • Catchment and Coastal
      • Forests
      • Lakes, Rivers and Wetlands
      • Mining
      • Oceans and Fisheries
      • Organics and GE
      • Waste
      • Energy
      • Resource Management
    • Current Petitions
    • Join a Working Group
      • Improved environmental management and laws
      • Conservation, biosecurity and biodiversity
      • Oceans, marine and fisheries
      • International, IUCN, Antarctica and the Southern Ocean
      • Climate Change and Energy
      • Open Democratic and Participative Society
      • Policy and promotion of our vision for the environment
  • Connect with ECO
    • Join ECO
    • Volunteering & Oppurtunities
  • Contact
Donate
Click Me
Some text

This content will appear inside a popup...

MPI reviews New Zealand fisheries – are we really world-leading?

Posted on 21/10/2015
No Comments

Cath Wallace reviews the Ministry of Primary Industries fisheries review, currently under way  C Wallace

The Ministry of Primary Industries (MPI) is embarking on a significant review of New Zealand fisheries management.    In many ways a review is welcome, but ECO has difficulty both with some of the matters that have been ruled out of scope and some of the assertions that New Zealand fisheries management sustainability is not to be questioned.

Among the questions that ECO asked is whether New Zealand’s system of fisheries management really is world-leading and sustainable as the Ministry promotes.

Fisheries law in New Zealand still does not include an active precautionary approach.  Nor does it have an Ecosystem-Based management approach, the now widely accepted framework for fisheries management elsewhere.

Fisheries  in New Zealand are still impacting on many non-target species and marine communities. This includes  threatened endemic species – including Maui and Hector’s dolphins, many albatross and petrel species, and NZ sea lions.

Bottom fishing is still impacting on benthic biodiversity and we are still in the early days of implementing the current National Plans of Action on Seabirds and Sharks.  One of the major flaws of the fisheries Quota Management System is that there is little attention paid to the environmental impacts of fishing (except on the charismatic megafauna) and there are few measures in place to review or incentivise fishing methods and their imapcts.  For the most part, companies hold fisheries quota and there is rarely  attention to the methods by which it is caught and their impacts on ecosystems and invertebrates and their communities and habitats.

MPI’s director of sector policy, Jarred Mair says there will be plenty of opportunity for people to have their say throughout this process. “The first phase of the review, beginning now, is about gathering information from stakeholders and the public about what is working and what might be priorities for change.”

“We’ll then summarise what we’ve heard and bring that back for feedback in early 2016. If it is decided that change is needed, MPI will develop proposals and there will be another opportunity to have your say”.

MPI says that it won’t be looking to make changes to core elements of the quota management system. Similarly, the existing rights and interests of recreational, customary and commercial fishers, as well as Treaty settlements, are not in scope.

MPI is also reviewing cost recovery provisions in the Fisheries Act 1996. These provisions apply to fisheries research and management, and also to impacts on protected species under conservation legislation.  The provisions are in need of reform.

The current provisions have been used to restrict and limit fisheries research which is less than half of what it was, in real terms, over 20 years ago.  For most of the stocks in the quota management system, little is known about sustainable yields.  Perversely, the smaller the stock, the less the industry wants to spend on research.  Decisions can be made on information that is many years old.   Ecosystem impacts information is not routinely collected.

This could be an opportunity to achieve ecosystem-based management, proper environmental impact assessments, the precautionary principle and catch limits for the ecosystem rather than for the fishing industry.  We might even get recognition of the in-situ values of fish in the sea – performing their ecosystem functions and providing other non-market values.

It is also likely that the fishing industry will want to gain even more control over the specification, design and conduct of fisheries research, and that they will want to privatise fisheries management.  The Review includes a goal of gaining “social licence” for fishing – which could be code for legitimising business as usual.

Previous Post
The National Science Challenges
Next Post
Reporting on the ECO Conference on freshwater: an international perspective

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Fill out this field
Fill out this field
Please enter a valid email address.
You need to agree with the terms to proceed

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Recent Posts

  • Emerging from the Shadows: Resource Management System Reform 08/03/2022
  • ECO calls for more funding on climate action and biodiversity protection 08/03/2022
  • Importance of protecting Significant Natural Areas 05/08/2021
  • ECO calls for an end to bottom trawling on seamounts and other underwater ecosystems. 08/06/2021
  • Consultation on phasing out fossil fuels in process heat 21/04/2021

Categories

  • Agriculture and farming (2)
  • Antarctica (2)
  • Biodiversity (14)
  • Building (1)
  • Climate Change (19)
  • Conservation (14)
  • COVID (1)
  • ECO (7)
  • Fisheries (10)
  • Forestry (1)
  • Freshwater (7)
  • Genetic Engineering (2)
  • Health (3)
  • Marine (10)
  • Oceania (8)
  • Organics (1)
  • Pollution (7)
  • Resource Management Act (1)
  • Science (11)
  • Uncategorized (10)

ECO is a registered charitable entity under the Charities Act 2005. ECO was founded in 1971 as CoEnCo to meet the needs of the conservation community. We became ECO in 1976. We are a non-profit network of 50+ organizations with a concern for conservation and the environment.

Important Links

  • What We Do
  • Our Team
  • Join A Working Group
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy
Donate Now

Contacts

eco@eco.org.nz
04 385-7545
Level 2, 126 Vivian St, Wellington 6011, PO Box 11-057 Wellington New Zealand 6142
Facebook
Twitter

Recent Posts

  • Emerging from the Shadows: Resource Management System Reform 08/03/2022
  • ECO calls for more funding on climate action and biodiversity protection 08/03/2022
  • Importance of protecting Significant Natural Areas 05/08/2021
  • ECO calls for an end to bottom trawling on seamounts and other underwater ecosystems. 08/06/2021
  • Consultation on phasing out fossil fuels in process heat 21/04/2021

© Copyright 2008-2021 – Environment and Conservation Organisations of New Zealand (ECO) Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Site designed & hosted by Alpharditech

Sitemap | Disclaimer